
Game names provide a critical first impression, potentially shaping players' aesthetic experiences before gameplay even begins. But how different naming strategies influence player perception remains underexplored. This study investigated the impact of name type, specifically comparing evocative/conceptual names (e.g., 'Stardust Echoes') against descriptive names (e.g., 'Space Shooter'), on players' aesthetic evaluations. Across three experiments using AI-generated game concepts, evocative names consistently yielded higher ratings of liking and interest compared to descriptive or absent names. Furthermore, participants perceived original evocative names as a better fit for the game concepts and were more likely to express an intention to try games bearing such names. These results underscore the importance of a name's conceptual and evocative power, suggesting that names going beyond simple description can significantly boost a game's aesthetic appeal and initial player attraction.
Descriptive Name, Conceptual Information, Game Name, Interest, Evocative Name, Liking, Aesthetic Evaluation
Descriptive Name, Conceptual Information, Game Name, Interest, Evocative Name, Liking, Aesthetic Evaluation
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
