Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
ZENODOarrow_drop_down
ZENODO
Dataset . 2026
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
ZENODO
Dataset . 2026
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

Impact of variations in ALD procedure on nanomorphology, protecting properties and chemical stability of thin TiO2 Films

Authors: Imrich, Tomáš;

Impact of variations in ALD procedure on nanomorphology, protecting properties and chemical stability of thin TiO2 Films

Abstract

Thin TiO2 films were deposited by atomic layer deposition (ALD) at 150 and 250 °C on FTO and Si/SiO2 substrates to examine the effect of deposition conditions on morphology, structure, chemical stability, and photoelectrochemical performance. Films grown at 150 °C were amorphous and crystallised into anatase after annealing at 500 °C, accompanied by nanoscale morphological rearrangement. In contrast, films deposited at 250 °C were amorphous and non-stoichiometric (TiO2−x) with Ti3+ self-doping; annealing reduced the doping level without inducing crystallisation. The films degraded in 0.1 M HClO4 within 72 h but remained stable in alkaline media (pH 8). Electrochemical studies using the [Fe(CN)6]3−/4− redox couple showed that low-temperature ALD TiO2 layers (8–50 nm) effectively blocked charge transfer, whereas this approach was unsuitable for high-temperature ALD films due to self-doping. The as-deposited high-temperature ALD TiO2/FTO exhibits higher photoelectrochemical (PEC) efficiency than low-temperature films due to Ti3+ self-doping. The as-deposited low-temperature ALD TiO2/FTO shows negligible PEC efficiency, which increases significantly after annealing owing to the formation of the anatase phase.

Keywords

chemical stability, ALD, morphology, TiO2, doping, protective properties, crystallinity

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average