
The Core Emotion Framework (CEF) introduces a structural‐constructivist model of affective function that resolves the long‐standing nature–nurture debate by distinguishing innate emotional architecture from learned misuse. It defines ten universal Core Emotions organized into Head, Heart, and Gut centers, with Accepting as thefoundational base state. Pathology arises when Constricting fuses rigidly with action components, producing Structural Entanglement and the self‐perpetuating Vicious Cycle of compulsive obstinacy. Therapeutic resolution occurs through the Creative Insight Paradox—an “Aha!” moment of Structural Disassembly—where a suppressed emotion re‐emerges to shatter rigidity and restore functional separation. Sustained equilibrium requires continuous practice of Yielding, Discernment, and Elevation, enabling dynamic flexibility and non‐compulsive assertiveness. By reframing typological models as descriptive maps of pathology rather than identity, and byproposing validation protocols that measure structural integrity rather than trait intensity, the CEF positions itself as a diagnostic and therapeutic instrument for affective actualization and emotional regulation. Keywords: Core Emotion Framework, structural-constructivism, affective neuroscience, emotional actualization, Head-Heart-Gut centers, compulsive obstinacy, structural entanglement, emotional rigidity, Creative Insight Paradox, Aha! moment, structural disassembly, emotional flexibility, non-compulsive assertiveness, affective equilibrium, personality typology critique, Enneagram analysis, emotion dysregulation, Borderline Personality Disorder, psychometric validation, nature-nurture resolution.
FOS: Psychology, Emotions/classification, Emotions, Psychology, Emotional Adjustment
FOS: Psychology, Emotions/classification, Emotions, Psychology, Emotional Adjustment
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
