Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ ZENODOarrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ZENODO
Other literature type . 2021
License: CC BY
Data sources: ZENODO
ZENODO
Presentation . 2021
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
ZENODO
Presentation . 2021
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

Assessing Effects of Herbicides on Reproduction of Non-Target Terrestrial Plants in the Field: DOs and DON´Ts

Authors: Isemer, Rena; Ovcharova, Viktoriia; Koehler, Petra; Jans, Daniela; Ducrot, Virginie;

Assessing Effects of Herbicides on Reproduction of Non-Target Terrestrial Plants in the Field: DOs and DON´Ts

Abstract

To assess potential risks of herbicide use for non-target terrestrial plants (NTTPs), routine testing in form of standardized lower tier studies is conducted. In these studies, effects on vegetative parameters (e.g. shoot weight, emergence, survival) are measured in the greenhouse. Higher tier testing may be needed to assess whether the identified risks may occur under more realistic conditions in the field and whether the herbicide potentially affects reproduction of plants. We developed a method for conducting higher tier field studies with NTTPs (Isemer et al., 2020. A Field Study Method as a Potential Higher Tier Option to Refine Herbicide Risk Assessment for Nontarget Terrestrial Plants IEAM 16, pp 691-705) which allows for assessing and comparing effects on reproductive and vegetative parameters. Throughout the growing season 2017 (May to September), the sulfonyl-urea herbicide iofensulfuron-sodium was tested on 11 plant species sown as a seed mixture for establishing artificial plant communities on a test acre in Germany. Three herbicide rates were applied, and vegetative parameters (vegetation cover, dry biomass of total vegetation, phytotoxicity, BBCH stage) were assessed. In order to measure effects on reproduction, fully ripened seeds were collected from the plants in the field during the last two months of the study and germination of the F1 generation was assessed in the greenhouse. Other reproduction measurements (e.g. number of flowers, yield) were regarded as less suitable because recording of these parameters in the field was proven to be infeasible in our study design. Furthermore, F1 seed germination is identified as an important parameter for plant species population dynamics. Suitability of the used test species for reproduction testing was judged by their seed´s availability in the test plots, collectability, seed handling and ability to germinate in the lab. In order to compare effects of different growing conditions, the germination tests were done in petri dishes on filter papers, in pots filled with soil as well as in the dark or in a dark/light regime, respectively. Results indicated that growing conditions need to be carefully considered when conducting germination experiments in order to not tamper effects of the herbicide treatment. In conclusion, vegetative endpoints were lower than reproductive endpoints confirming that reproduction is not generally the more sensitive parameter.

DE, pdf, rena.isemer@bayer.com 

Related Organizations
Keywords

reproduction, field study, higher tier, risk assessment, non-target terrestrial plants, environmental

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Green