
The healthcare sector in the United States has experienced increased incidences of data breaches which poses significant challenges to patient privacy, financial stability, and organizational integrity. This paper conducts a cost-benefit analysis of the two primary approaches, prevention and recovery, in addressing data breaches. This research leverages both industry reports and statistical analyses to measure the financial and operational implications of the breaches to the US healthcare sector. The study reveals that despite costly investments made towards preventive efforts such as training of the organizational staff, conducting regular system audits and robust cybersecurity frameworks and assessment, they prove more cost effective in mitigating long-term damages. On the other hand, recovery costs such as legal expenses, data restoration, and repair of reputational damage are usually cumulatively higher and erodes public confidence. Through comparative analyses this paper highlights the economic and operational benefits of proactive strategies. Recommendations are given for healthcare organizations to take a proactive stance and focus on balancing resources for cybersecurity infrastructure as well as developing cybersecurity workforce training. This research highlights the importance of moving from reactive to more proactive strategies, while not denying the importance of both in ensuring improved patient security and a decreased risk of financial liability.
Cybersecurity, Healthcare, Cost-benefit analysis, Data breach
Cybersecurity, Healthcare, Cost-benefit analysis, Data breach
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
