Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
ZENODOarrow_drop_down
ZENODO
Other literature type . 2025
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
ZENODO
Other literature type . 2025
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

Cross-Scale Parameter Constraints for Quantum Cosmic Brain Framework: Empirical Validation from Galaxy Rotation to Solar System Dynamics

Authors: Roldan, Victor R.;

Cross-Scale Parameter Constraints for Quantum Cosmic Brain Framework: Empirical Validation from Galaxy Rotation to Solar System Dynamics

Abstract

The Quantum Cosmic Brain (M_QCB) framework proposes information-complexity coupling to gravitational dynamics through a scalar field mechanism. Using Multi-AI Collaborative Orchestration (MACO) methodology coordinating ChatGPT, Claude, and Gemini AI systems, we derive empirically constrained parameters for the QCB scalar sector from two independent scales: (1) galaxy rotation dynamics from SPARC database analysis (N=173 galaxies), and (2) Earth-Moon orbital recession measurements from Lunar Laser Ranging data. Galaxy-scale analysis yields strong correlation (r = 0.851, p < 0.0001) between information complexity and rotation anomalies, establishing effective coupling ratio C_eff ≈ 2.083. Solar System constraints require suppression factor S ≈ 1.418×10⁻¹¹ to match observed 3.8 cm/year lunar recession rate. Cross-scale consistency determines refined parameters: coupling constant γ = 1.0 and characteristic field scale φ_c ≈ 265.6 km. Results demonstrate QCB framework consistency across 10+ orders of magnitude in spatial scale, with cosmological predictions of H_0 = 74.33 km/s/Mpc (resolving Hubble tension) and σ_8 = 0.745. Full methodology, data, and MACO implementation documented for independent replication.

Keywords

cosmology, dark energy, galaxy rotation curves, information theory, scalar field theory, cross-scale physics, MACO, multi-AI validation

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!