Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ ZENODOarrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ZENODO
Dataset . 2025
License: CC BY
Data sources: ZENODO
ZENODO
Dataset . 2025
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
ZENODO
Dataset . 2025
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

Predicting Resting Metabolic Rate in healthy adults: A Comparative Analysis Using the enable cohort

Authors: Brandl, Beate; Keppner, Gloria-Maria; Manz, Quirin; Schicker, Corinna; Fromm, Tobias; Holzapfel, Christina; Kleigrewe, Karin; +7 Authors

Predicting Resting Metabolic Rate in healthy adults: A Comparative Analysis Using the enable cohort

Abstract

Background: Resting metabolic rate (RMR) is modulated by a variety of factors. Accurate prediction of RMR is essential for planning energy requirements but remains challenging due to inter-individual variability. Objective: This study aimed to develop and evaluate machine learning models for predicting RMR using comprehensive data from the cross-sectional enable study and to identify the most predictive and stable features across different study populations. Methods: RMR was predicted using data from 454 participants of the enable phenotyping platform (Freising and Nuremberg cohort). We systematically compared linear and nonlinear machine learning models trained on either the full set of 94 predictors or a reduced set of routinely accessible variables, including sex, age, body weight, fat mass, and fat-free mass. Model performance was assessed by cross-validation. The best-performing model (Lasso) was further evaluated on independent test datasets from other cohorts. Feature importance and stability were assessed using repeated cross-validation and marginal variance decomposition. Results: Lasso regression consistently outperformed other models, particularly when trained on the enable cohort feature set. The final model explained 76.8% of RMR variance in the Freising cohort. Key predictive features included fat-free mass, body weight, and mean outdoor temperature. Blood-based features contributed marginally, whereas microbiota and fecal short chain fatty acids variables did not contribute to explaining RMR. Conclusion: This novel prediction model for RMR shows improved accuracy in comparison to traditional models. While microbiota composition did not contribute to explain the residual variation in RMR, the inclusion of clinical blood parameters and outdoor temperature improved predictive performance.

Keywords

Resting metabolic rate, energy expenditure, machine learning, predictive modeling, environmental factors, Lasso regression, Temperature Effects, Gut microbiota composition

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average