The global imperative to transition to renewable energy sources to combat climate change presents a complex and often overlooked challenge: the escalating demand for critical minerals. This paper explores "The Green Extractivism Paradox," a term encapsulating the inherent contradiction between the environmental and social goals of renewable energy and the significant extractive impacts required to achieve them. The shift away from fossil fuels necessitates an unprecedented increase in the mining of minerals such as lithium, cobalt, nickel, and rare earth elements, which are vital components of electric vehicles, wind turbines, and solar panels. Geographically, this demand concentrates extraction in a limited number of countries, often in the Global South, perpetuating historical patterns of resource exploitation and creating new geopolitical dependencies. The paper critically examines the socio-environmental consequences, including land degradation, water pollution, and human rights issues, particularly affecting indigenous communities and vulnerable populations. It further analyzes the geopolitical ramifications of these new critical mineral geographies, highlighting supply chain vulnerabilities and the potential for increased resource nationalism and conflict. Ultimately, the paper argues for a holistic approach to energy transition that transcends a purely technological focus, integrating principles of environmental justice, circular economy, and decolonial frameworks to foster truly sustainable and equitable renewable energy futures.