Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ ZENODOarrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ZENODO
Other literature type . 2025
License: CC BY
Data sources: ZENODO
ZENODO
Presentation . 2025
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
ZENODO
Presentation . 2025
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

Making the Digital Humanities More Diverse and Inclusive: Theories and Practices

Authors: Lang, Sarah;

Making the Digital Humanities More Diverse and Inclusive: Theories and Practices

Abstract

Slides of the presentation Making the Digital Humanities More Diverse and Inclusive: Theories and Practices held by Dr. Sarah Lang in the lecture series Digital Humanities in Focus: Methods, Applications, and Perspectives at the University of Rostock (online) on October 27, 2025. Abstract: This talk revisits the concept of the “dark sides of DH” as a lens for examining persistent structural issues in digital humanities. Originally focused on neoliberalism, these debates revealed discomfort with DH’s institutional positioning and perceived lack of critical engagement. Internally, DH is often seen as a progressive force, yet may be blinded by vocational awe—the uncritical belief in its intrinsic virtue—which can obscure systemic inequalities. These concerns, still as relevant today as when the topic of “dark sides” was first discussed, reflect entrenched disparities inherited from academia and the tech industry. Issues including limited engagement with AI ethics, data gaps, language diversity, and the marginalisation of feminist perspectives, despite their potential to address structural imbalances still persist today. Furthermore, the dominance of AI and other computational (rather than “just digital”) methods narrows the scope of what is considered legitimate research in the field, limiting potential for more inclusive representation. It is a naive assumption that good people will know how to act ethically because this requires skills and tools. This talk highlights practical strategies to address current challenges, drawing on dataset audits and the forthcoming ZfdG Working Paper on Data Feminism from the AG Empowerment group. Grounded in critical archival studies, these initiatives offer accessible approaches for promoting more equitable, inclusive practices in DH. Bio: Sarah Lang is Head of Digital Humanities at the Max Planck Institute for the History of Science (Berlin). Previously, she was a Postdoctoral Fellow at the Centre for Information Modelling at the University of Graz. Trained in History and Classics in Graz and Montpellier, she completed a PhD on early modern alchemical literature in 2021, combining Digital Humanities and the history of science, for which she received the Bader Prize of the Austrian Academy of Sciences.As convenor of the Empowerment Working Group of the German Digital Humanities Association (DHd), where she is also on the board of directors, Sarah Lang is interested in issues like (gender) data gaps, data feminism, diversity in DH, decolonizing data, data ethics and related topics.

Keywords

Digital Humanities, Diversity, Data Gaps, Data Feminism

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Green
Related to Research communities