
This work examines the growing “FUD Industrial Complex,” an ecosystem of privacy apps, tools, and influencers that profit from fear rather than providing effective protection. The analysis shows how all-in-one privacy services centralize user risk, how rebranded or misleading hardware and software products create new vulnerabilities, and how fear-based influencers promote exaggerated threats to drive engagement. The paper argues that meaningful privacy is contextual and requires evidence-based practices rather than universal, fear-driven solutions. It highlights the need for clearer vetting, better user education, and modern frameworks aligned with Ubiquitous Technical Surveillance (UTS). Contact: www.theutsguy.com
Ubiquitous Technical Surveillance
Ubiquitous Technical Surveillance
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
