Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ ZENODOarrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ZENODO
Article . 2025
License: CC BY
Data sources: ZENODO
ZENODO
Article . 2025
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
ZENODO
Article . 2025
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

Smart material adoption in mechanical engineering: additive manufacturing and green material perception under the moderating influence of cost-benefit evaluation

Authors: MINH VINH VO1*, QUANG MINH PHAM2, THI DIEM KIEU TRAN3;

Smart material adoption in mechanical engineering: additive manufacturing and green material perception under the moderating influence of cost-benefit evaluation

Abstract

This research investigates the determinants that steer the incorporation of smart materials in mechanical engineering, with a keen eye on the effects of additive manufacturing (AM) abilities, attitudes toward sustainable materials, and cost-benefit evaluation (CBE). Utilizing the Technology Adoption Model (TAM) alongside the Triple Bottom Line (TBL) framework, this investigation formulates a comprehensive model that interconnects technological readiness, environmental awareness, and economic evaluation. Employing a quantitative, cross-sectional methodology, data were gathered from 385 professionals engaged in Vietnam’s mechanical engineering industry and subjected to analyses including reliability testing, exploratory factor analysis, multiple regression, and moderation analysis utilizing SPSS 20. The findings indicate that both AM capabilities (β = 0.712) and perceptions of green materials (β = 0.816) exert a significant and positive impact on the adoption of smart materials. Furthermore, CBE serves as a moderating variable (β = 0.470), enhancing the effect of environmental perceptions on adoption decisions. These results underscore the notion that technological proficiency and a commitment to sustainability foster innovation, but only when organizations recognize economic justification. The research contributes to theoretical discourse by augmenting TAM with considerations of ecological and financial dimensions, while offering practical insights for managers and policymakers seeking to harmonize sustainability with profitability in material innovation.

Keywords

Smart Materials Adoption, Additive Manufacturing, Green Perception, Cost–Benefit Evaluation

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average