Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ ZENODOarrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ZENODO
Article . 2025
License: CC BY
Data sources: ZENODO
Global Journal of Economic and Finance Research
Article . 2025 . Peer-reviewed
Data sources: Crossref
ZENODO
Article . 2025
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
ZENODO
Article . 2025
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
versions View all 3 versions
addClaim

Virtual Teams in the Workplace: A Global Performance-Based Bibliometric Review Across Three Decades (1990–2024)

Authors: Saleh Alkoud;

Virtual Teams in the Workplace: A Global Performance-Based Bibliometric Review Across Three Decades (1990–2024)

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to conduct a bibliometric analysis of workplace research on virtual teams. The study conducted a bibliometric analysis of articles published over the last three decades (1990– 2024). The study uses bibliometric analysis by conducting performance analysis including citation analysis by looking at 413 documents that were taken from the Scopus database. The study looked at countries and institutions, the most influential papers, prolific writers, and countries. VOSviewer was employed in the study as a performance analysis tool. The most influential institutions and nations are the” United States” and the “University of Santiago De Compostela” in Spain, respectively. 2023 was the most productive year with 51 publications. Likewise, “The Academy of Management Executive” is the most influential publication, while “Team-Level Predictors of Innovation at Work: A Comprehensive Meta-Analysis Spanning Three Decades of Research” is the most cited article. This research is unique because it takes a broad approach, spanning the development of virtual team research across a thirty-year period. Particularly in topics like trust-building in virtual teams, the impact of digital platforms, and cultural diversity in global virtual teams, it emphasizes knowledge gaps and offers suggestions for future research. This study contributes to the existing literature by offering a systematic review of virtual team research, guiding scholars toward addressing under-researched areas, and providing insights for the development of virtual work environments.

Related Organizations
Keywords

Virtual Team, Remote Team, Hybrid Team, E-Team, Digital Team, Distributed Team

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Green