
Background: The growing resistance of Escherichia coli and Pseudomonas aeruginosa to antimicrobial treatments poses a major public health concern, particularly in the treatment of hospital-acquired wound infections. Aim: This study investigated the antimicrobial resistance profile of Escherichia coli and Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolated from patients with wound infections in Imo State, Nigeria. Study Design: A total of 76 bacterial isolates, comprising Escherichia coli and Pseudomonas aeruginosa, were recovered from patients with clinically infected wounds and subjected to antimicrobial susceptibility testing against a panel of antibiotics representing multiple antibiotic classes, to determine their antimicrobial resistance profiles. Methodology: Antimicrobial susceptibility testing was performed using the disc diffusion method, as outlined in the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute CLSI (2017) guidelines. The isolates were tested against cephalosporins, carbapenems, polymyxins, and quinolones, which include ceftazidime (10μg), ceftriaxone (30μg), cefepime (30μg), imipenem (10μg), meropenem (10μg), colistin (10μg), polymyxin B (30μg), ciprofloxacin (5μg), and levofloxacin (5μg), to determine susceptibility profiles. Results: Findings revealed a high prevalence of multidrug resistance (MDR) among the gram-negative bacterial isolates, with a substantial proportion of isolates exhibiting resistance to three or more antibiotic classes. Specifically, 43.9% (18) of Pseudomonas aeruginosa and 45.71% (16) of Escherichia coli isolates were identified as MDR. Notably, a significant number of Escherichia coli and Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolates exhibited resistance to various antibiotic classes, including cephalosporins, carbapenems, polymyxins, and quinolones. However, carbapenems demonstrated remarkable efficacy, with a significant majority of isolates showing susceptibility — 92.68% of Pseudomonas aeruginosa and 90% of Escherichia coli isolates. Conclusion: The study highlights the urgent need for robust antimicrobial stewardship and infection control practices to preserve the efficacy of available antibiotics in the treatment of clinical wound infections.
Carbapenems, Wound infection, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Escherichia coli, Multidrug resistance, Antimicrobial resistance
Carbapenems, Wound infection, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Escherichia coli, Multidrug resistance, Antimicrobial resistance
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
