Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ ZENODOarrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ZENODO
Dataset
Data sources: ZENODO
addClaim

Valorization of Pumpkin Peels as Agro-Food Processing Waste for Sustainable Biochar and Hydrochar Production: Environmental Assessment and Structural Characterization

Authors: Uysal, Mürüvet Hazel; Sharma, Monica; ÇOBAN, SEMA; Akbulut Uludag, Ahsen; Altundağ, Hüseyin; Simha Martynková, Gražyna; Cetinkaya, Tugrul; +2 Authors

Valorization of Pumpkin Peels as Agro-Food Processing Waste for Sustainable Biochar and Hydrochar Production: Environmental Assessment and Structural Characterization

Abstract

The valorization of agricultural wastes such as pumpkin peel generated from the foodprocessing industry through thermochemical conversion offers sustainable solutions forboth waste management and carbon cycling. This study aims to evaluate the physicochemicalproperties and environmental impacts of charcoals produced from pumpkin peelwaste (PPW), without the use of chemicals or pre-washing. In this context, pumpkin peelhydrochar (PPH) was produced by hydrothermal carbonization (HTC) and pumpkin peelbiochar (PPB) by pyrolysis. The systems were modeled according to a pilot-scale scenariobased on the processing of 100 kg of PPW, and the functional unit was defined as theprocessing of this amount. The properties of the products were determined by variousphysicochemical characterization techniques, and environmental impacts were analyzedusing Life Cycle Assessment (LCA). The results showed that PPH has a higher specificsurface area (16.35 m2 g−1) than PPB (9.80 m2 g−1), as well as a higher carbon content(76.18% for PPH and 66.07% for PPB). Furthermore, the environmental impact of PPH(16.42 kg CO2-equivalent/FU) is lower than that of PPB (32.33 kg CO2-equivalent/FU).Based on the obtained physicochemical properties, the potential of both materials as soilconditioners has been evaluated. The lower environmental impact values suggest thatPPH may be a more advantageous alternative in terms of sustainability. However, thisevaluation is not based on direct soil application experiments, and further applied studiesare needed to confirm this potential.

Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback