Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ ZENODOarrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ZENODO
Other literature type . 2025
License: CC BY
Data sources: ZENODO
ZENODO
Presentation . 2025
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
ZENODO
Presentation . 2025
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

A Survey on Metadata for Machine Learning Models and Datasets: Standards, Practices, and Harmonization Challenges

Authors: Gesese, Genet Asefa;

A Survey on Metadata for Machine Learning Models and Datasets: Standards, Practices, and Harmonization Challenges

Abstract

This was a talk presented at the Sci-K Workshop co-located with ISWC 2025 in Nara, Japan.The growing availability of machine learning (ML) models, datasets, and related artifacts across platforms, such as Hugging Face, GitHub, and Zenodo, has amplified the need for structured and standardized metadata. However, metadata practices remain highly heterogeneous, differing in schema design, vocabulary usage, and semantic expressiveness, posing significant challenges for tasks such as representation, extraction, alignment, and integration. This fragmentation impedes the development of infrastructures that depend on machine-actionable metadata to support discovery, provenance tracking, or cross-platform interoperability. While metadata is also foundational to enabling FAIR (Findable, Accessible, Interoperable, and Reusable) principles in ML, there is a lack of consolidated understanding of how existing standards support interoperability and alignment across platforms. In this survey, we review and compare a range of general-purpose and ML-specific metadata standards, evaluating their suitability for cross-platform alignment, discoverability, extensibility, and interoperability. We assess these standards based on defined criteria and analyze their potential to support unified, FAIR-compliant metadata infrastructures for ML, laying the groundwork for scalable and interoperable tooling in future ML ecosystems.

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Green