Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ ZENODOarrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ZENODO
Other literature type . 2025
License: CC BY
Data sources: ZENODO
ZENODO
Presentation . 2025
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
ZENODO
Presentation . 2025
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

Implementing the Agreement on Reforming Research Assessment in RPOs: Lessons from the CNR Pilot

Authors: Mannocci, Andrea; Provost, Lottie; Di Donato, Francesca; Pecoraro, Fabrizio;

Implementing the Agreement on Reforming Research Assessment in RPOs: Lessons from the CNR Pilot

Abstract

In 2022, the National Research Council of Italy (CNR) committed to reforming internal career progression for its researchers and technologists. As a result, four large-scale competitive selections were launched in 2023, covering 45 Career Assessment Fields (CAFs) and more than 40 research products or qualifications per CAF. Between 2023 and 2025, over 3,500 staff members have been evaluated. Within this context, the pilot pursued two main objectives: first, to analyse the evaluation criteria and their alignment with the first four commitments of the Agreement on Reforming Research Assessment (ARRA); and second, to explore how GraspOS services and tools could be leveraged to enhance both the application and evaluation processes. In this talk, we will present the key lessons learned from the pilot. The first objective involved a qualitative and quantitative analysis of 3,820 individual criteria extracted from PDFs produced by evaluation committees. This analysis examined how the ARRA commitments were operationalised—specifically, whether research products were treated as equally valuable, whether assessments were predominantly mechanical, whether discrimination based on venue or format occurred, and whether rankings were employed. The second objective focused on assessing the extent to which the SCOPE+i framework and a decentralised assessment infrastructure, such as that developed within GraspOS, could support the design of an evaluation campaign similar to the one conducted at CNR.

Keywords

Research Institute, Research Assessment, GraspOS

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Green
Funded by
Related to Research communities
EGI : advanced computing for research