
In 2022, the National Research Council of Italy (CNR) committed to reforming internal career progression for its researchers and technologists. As a result, four large-scale competitive selections were launched in 2023, covering 45 Career Assessment Fields (CAFs) and more than 40 research products or qualifications per CAF. Between 2023 and 2025, over 3,500 staff members have been evaluated. Within this context, the pilot pursued two main objectives: first, to analyse the evaluation criteria and their alignment with the first four commitments of the Agreement on Reforming Research Assessment (ARRA); and second, to explore how GraspOS services and tools could be leveraged to enhance both the application and evaluation processes. In this talk, we will present the key lessons learned from the pilot. The first objective involved a qualitative and quantitative analysis of 3,820 individual criteria extracted from PDFs produced by evaluation committees. This analysis examined how the ARRA commitments were operationalised—specifically, whether research products were treated as equally valuable, whether assessments were predominantly mechanical, whether discrimination based on venue or format occurred, and whether rankings were employed. The second objective focused on assessing the extent to which the SCOPE+i framework and a decentralised assessment infrastructure, such as that developed within GraspOS, could support the design of an evaluation campaign similar to the one conducted at CNR.
Research Institute, Research Assessment, GraspOS
Research Institute, Research Assessment, GraspOS
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
