
The GraspOS Social Sciences and Humanities (SSH) pilot, led by OPERAS Research Infrastructure, offers a case study of scientific domain reform through co-creation. It gathered essential data, articulated domain-specific requirements, and acted as a living laboratory for testing the GraspOS Federated Open Infrastructure and the SCOPE+i Framework. This presentation traces the pilot's journey. Guided by the SCOPE Framework's principle “Evaluate with the evaluated,” the SSH Pilot used a Community of Practice and a series of workshops to involve the community in identifying what outputs, activities, and processes should be valued in research assessment. This co-creation process also included a collaborative evaluation of a Narrative CV template tailored to SSH. Finally, the guidance and recommendations resulting from the SSH Pilot were also validated by the community in a final workshop. This approach gave the SSH community a real voice and contributed to reinforcing a sense of ownership.
Humanities, Responsible Research Assessment, Social Sciences, FOS: Humanities, Research Assessment, SCOPE Framework
Humanities, Responsible Research Assessment, Social Sciences, FOS: Humanities, Research Assessment, SCOPE Framework
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
