
Background: Subarachnoid block is the preferred anaesthetic technique for Lower Segment Caesarean Section (LSCS). Adjuvants like fentanyl are used with local anaesthetics to enhance analgesia and reduce side effects. This study compares the efficacy of isobaric ropivacaine 0.5% with and without fentanyl for spinal anaesthesia in elective LSCS. Methods: In this prospective, double-blind, randomized study, 140 ASA I-II parturients scheduled for elective LSCS were allocated into two groups (n=70 each). Group RF received 2.0 ml of 0.5% isobaric ropivacaine with 25 µg fentanyl (0.5 ml). Group R received 2.0 ml of 0.5% isobaric ropivacaine with 0.5 ml normal saline. Parameters assessed included hemodynamics, onset and duration of sensory and motor block, duration of analgesia, and side effects. Results: The onset of sensory block was significantly faster in Group RF (2.21 ± 0.21 min) compared to Group R (3.31 ± 0.47 min) (p 0.711). The duration of analgesia was prolonged in Group RF (120.24 ± 13.26 min) compared to Group R (117.57 ± 14.66 min), though not statistically significant (p > 0.534). Hemodynamic changes were statistically significant between groups at various intervals. The incidence of hypotension was 8.5% in Group RF and 5.7% in Group R. Conclusion: The combination of intrathecal isobaric ropivacaine with fentanyl provides a significantly faster onset of sensory block and a clinically relevant, though not statistically significant, prolongation of sensory block and analgesia compared to plain isobaric ropivacaine. Both regimens are effective, but the fentanyl combination offers superior intraoperative parameters and a better quality of postoperative analgesia.
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
