Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ ZENODOarrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ZENODO
Article . 2025
License: CC BY
Data sources: ZENODO
ZENODO
Article . 2025
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
ZENODO
Article . 2025
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

A Randomized Clinical Trial Comparing the Antibacterial Properties of 0.5% Guava Leaf Extract Mouthwash With 0.1% Turmeric Extract Mouthwash in High-Caries-Risk Situations

Authors: Dr. Ekta Patel;

A Randomized Clinical Trial Comparing the Antibacterial Properties of 0.5% Guava Leaf Extract Mouthwash With 0.1% Turmeric Extract Mouthwash in High-Caries-Risk Situations

Abstract

Goal: To evaluate and contrast the antibacterial activity of mouthwashes containing 0.5% guava leaf extract and 0.1% turmeric extract on Streptococcus mutans counts in patients who are at high risk for dental cavities. Methods: This randomized clinical trial was conducted among 60 high-caries-risk patients (30 per group). Group A received 0.5% guava leaves extract mouthwash, while Group B received 0.1% turmeric extract mouthwash. Participants rinsed with 10 ml of mouthwash twice daily for 14 days. Saliva samples were collected at baseline and post-intervention to quantify S. mutans colonies using Mitis Salivarius Agar. Salivary pH was recorded, and patient satisfaction was assessed using a structured questionnaire. Results: The guava mouthwash group showed a significantly greater reduction in S. mutans counts (mean reduction: 2.1 × 10⁵ CFU/ml) compared to the turmeric group (mean reduction: 1.2 × 10⁵ CFU/ml) (p < 0.05). Salivary pH improved towards alkalinity in the guava group (from 6.4 to 7.0) compared to the turmeric group (from 6.5 to 6.8). Patient satisfaction scores were higher for guava (83.3% rated taste as pleasant) than turmeric (63.3%). Conclusion: Within the parameters of this study, 0.5% guava leaves extract mouthwash was more effective as an antibacterial agent against Streptococcus mutans than 0.1% turmeric extract mouthwash. It presents a promising natural alternative for managing dental caries risk.

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Green