Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ ZENODOarrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ZENODO
Article . 2025
License: CC BY
Data sources: ZENODO
ZENODO
Article . 2025
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
ZENODO
Article . 2025
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

Erosion of Grassroots Governance in Uganda: A case study of Sironko District Local Government in Uganda

Authors: Nandudu Nulu (Master MPAM Candidate); Aina-Obe Shamsuddin Bolatito (PhD);

Erosion of Grassroots Governance in Uganda: A case study of Sironko District Local Government in Uganda

Abstract

Uganda's decentralisation policy, at first regarded as a paradigm of grassroots democratisation and participatory development aimed at transferring power and control to grassroots institutions, is now increasingly compromised by a combination of political, institutional, and fiscal limitations, thereby resulting in a decline of local autonomy, accountability, and citizen engagement. This research examines the decline of grassroots governance in Uganda, focusing on a detailed case study of the Sironko District Local Government. Utilising 30 key informant interviews, six focus group discussions, document analysis, and field observations, the research demonstrates that political interference, fiscal dependence on central transfers, administrative capacity deficits, and declining citizen participation have collectively undermined the functionality and legitimacy of local government institutions. By employing a qualitative case study methodology of principal-agent and participatory governance theories to elucidate the functional incapacitation of decentralised structures despite their formal integrity. The paper demonstrates that grassroots institutions function with restricted autonomy, procedural involvement, and minimal downward accountability, which ultimately perpetuates a cycle of institutional dysfunction and public disillusionment as factors in the decline of grassroots governance in the context of Uganda's decentralisation framework, focusing on Sironko District as a representative empirical case. Principal findings underscore political meddling by central authorities, insufficient fiscal decentralisation, diminishing citizen participation, and the appropriation of local institutions by elite interests. The paper concludes with recommendations for structural, fiscal, and democratic reforms intended to enhance local governance and re-establish citizen-centred accountability within Uganda's decentralisation framework. Moreover, deficiencies in capacity among local council leaders and inadequate transparency in resource distribution have undermined community trust and service provision. The paper contends that the present trajectory indicates a decline from democratic local governance towards a more centralised and patronage-orientated structure. This jeopardises the developmental purpose of local governments and undermines inclusive involvement and accountability. Keywords: Local Government, Political Interference, Grassroots Governance, Decentralization, Ugandan Government,

Related Organizations
Keywords

Local Government, Grassroots Governance, Political Interference, Ugandan Government

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average