Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ ZENODOarrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ZENODO
Other literature type . 2025
License: CC BY
Data sources: ZENODO
ZENODO
Presentation . 2025
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
ZENODO
Presentation . 2025
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

Connecting Knowledge: A Vision for Inclusive and Empowered Bibliometrics

Authors: Lancho Barrantes, Barbara S.;

Connecting Knowledge: A Vision for Inclusive and Empowered Bibliometrics

Abstract

Presentation for Eugene Garfield’s Legacy and the Future of Scientometrics. Clarivate Eugene Garfield’s Legacy and the Future of Scientometrics Online event I 19 November (2pm - 4pm UK time zone) This year we are celebrating the Centennial of Dr Eugene Garfield, the visionary who founded the Institute for Scientific Information (ISI) and pioneered citation indexing. His groundbreaking innovations laid the foundation for modern scientometrics and Web of Science. This event revisits the intellectual roots and evolving horizons of scientometrics.The session traces the field’s transformation from the early days of information retrieval to the contemporary challenges of research evaluation, responsible metrics, and open science. Discussions will address the enduring tensions between peer review and quantitative assessment, examine the methodological pluralism of modern scientometrics, and envision a future of inclusive and ethically aware bibliometric practices.With an eye to the future, we ask how scientometrics can evolve to better capture the complexity of knowledge and contribute to a more connected, inclusive research ecosystem. AGENDA:2pm – 2:05pm Welcome and housekeeping 2:05pm – 2:25pm Memories and an Appreciation of Eugene Garfield by David Pendlebury 2:25pm – 2:45pm Towards Scientometrics 3.0 – Background, Promises, Challenges and Limitations of Bibliometrics of the Future by Wolfgang Glänzel 2:45pm – 3:05pm Counting What Counts: Why Bibliometrics Win (and Peer Review Loses) by Giovanni Abramo 3:05pm – 3:25pm Connecting Knowledge: A Vision for Inclusive and Empowered Bibliometrics by Barbara S. Lancho Barrantes 3:25pm – 3:40pm Scientometrics 3.0: Assessing Societal Impact of Research by Valentin Bogorov 3:40pm – 4:00pm Roundtable and Q&A 

Related Organizations
Keywords

Bibliometrics, scientometrics

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Green