
THE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN IMAGINATION AND PHANTASIA. PRACTICAL IMPLICATIONS AND THEORETICAL DEVELOPMENTS IN THE WORK OF MARC RICHIR. The text exploits the symbolic/phenomenological divide and focuses, in particular, on one direct consequence of the distinction between imagination and phantasia, albeit not the only one. It also attempts to clarify this distinction, which gives rise to the concept of “non-specular mimesis”. To suggest the practical implications of this concept, it will draw parallels with the “mirror stage” present in Lacanian psychoanalytic theory. The aim of the paper is to demonstrate how the phenomenological concept can contribute to the psychoanalytic one, thereby influencing practice. Psychoanalysts could adopt an attitude suggested by Richirian phenomenology, which could have beneficial effects for people experiencing mental distress.
Philosophy, Non-Specular Mimesis, Phantasia, Imagination, Logology, Wild Essences, Mirror Stage, FOS: Philosophy, ethics and religion
Philosophy, Non-Specular Mimesis, Phantasia, Imagination, Logology, Wild Essences, Mirror Stage, FOS: Philosophy, ethics and religion
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
