Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ ZENODOarrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ZENODO
Other literature type . 2025
License: CC BY
Data sources: ZENODO
ZENODO
Research . 2025
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
ZENODO
Research . 2025
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

Microbiome Engineering in Human Health and Agriculture

Authors: Disha, Adrita Idris; Sen Gupta Arka, Sudip;

Microbiome Engineering in Human Health and Agriculture

Abstract

This review paper discusses how microbiome engineering can improve both human health and agriculture by deliberately designing and managing microbial communities rather than focusing on single "probiotic" strains. It explains how gut microbiomes can be engineered with diet, probiotics, fecal microbiota transplantation, and live biotherapeutic products to produce beneficial metabolites, control pathogens, and support therapy. On the agricultural side, it covers how soil, plant, and animal (especially rumen) microbiomes can be manipulated to enhance nutrient use, increase stress tolerance and disease resistance, and reduce methane emissions from livestock. The paper also points out why many microbiome-based products fail in real-world conditions and proposes ecological design principles and better measurement tools to create more reliable, context-aware microbiome interventions. This review paper discusses how microbiome engineering can enhance both human health and agriculture by deliberately designing and managing microbial communities rather than focusing solely on individual "probiotic" strains. It explains how gut microbiomes can be optimized through diet, probiotics, fecal microbiota transplantation, and live biotherapeutic products to produce beneficial metabolites, control pathogens, and support therapeutic efforts. On the agricultural side, the paper describes how the microbiomes of soil, plants, and animals—particularly in the rumen—can be manipulated to improve nutrient usage, increase stress tolerance and disease resistance, and reduce methane emissions from livestock. Additionally, the paper highlights why many microbiome-based products fail in real-world applications and proposes ecological design principles, as well as improved measurement tools, to create more reliable, context-aware microbiome interventions. This review paper discusses how microbiome engineering can enhance both human health and agriculture by deliberately designing and managing microbial communities rather than focusing solely on individual "probiotic" strains. It explains how gut microbiomes can be optimized through diet, probiotics, fecal microbiota transplantation, and live biotherapeutic products to produce beneficial metabolites, control pathogens, and support therapeutic efforts. 

Keywords

plant microbiome interactions, gut microbiota, Agricultural biotechnology, Host-microbe interactions, FOS: Agricultural biotechnology, Sustainable agriculture, human health, microbial ecology, Precision microbiome modulation, probiotics, Soil Microbiology/standards, Microbiome, synthetic biology, Microbiome therapeutics, microbiome engineering, Soil Microbiology

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Green