Views provided by UsageCounts
doi: 10.5281/zenodo.17647
Big changes to how StarModel fits happen now---fitting now defaults to using MultiNest via PyMultiNest. To take advantage of this change, you must install MultiNest and PyMultiNest. If you don't have these packages, you can follow these directions to install them. MultiNest does a much better job than emcee of exploring the stellar model parameter space when only photometry is being used as observational constraints, because the posterior can be quite multi-modal. As a result, you must use MultiNest if you want a fair fit when you're just using photometry. The way to fit a StarModel now is using the .fit() method, which will default to .fit_multinest() if MultiNest is available, and will otherwise default back to using emcee via .fit_mcmc(). Please let me know if you have any troubles with this. The starfit command-line script should work the same as before; again defaulting to MultiNest if available. In addition, I have finally included unit tests: type nosetests isochrones on the command line to run them. If all goes well, everything should be OK.
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
| views | 4 |

Views provided by UsageCounts