Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ ZENODOarrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ZENODO
Dataset . 2026
License: CC BY
Data sources: ZENODO
ZENODO
Dataset . 2026
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
ZENODO
Dataset . 2026
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

Selective Auditory Attention Decoding for Bilateral Cochlear Implant Users and Normal Hearing Listeners in Duet Music

Authors: Althoff, Jonas; Nogueira, Waldo;

Selective Auditory Attention Decoding for Bilateral Cochlear Implant Users and Normal Hearing Listeners in Duet Music

Abstract

This dataset was collected for the article of the same name published in Journal of Neural Engineering. It was used to investigate whether it is possible to perform selective auditory attention decoding for music in cochlear implant users via electroencephalography (EEG). The dataset consists of the EEG data of 8 CI users, 8 normal hearing listeners, and the presentation files. Experimental Setup The EEG recording took place in an electromagnetically and acoustically shielded booth. A high-density continuous EEG was recorded using a SynAmps RT System with 64 electrodes mounted in a quik-cap electrode cap (Compumedics Neuroscan, Australia). The reference electrode was placed on the tip of the nose and two additional measuring electrodes were placed on the mastoids.The sampling rate was 20 kHz with an internal hardware low-pass filter of 1,500 Hz. EEG electrodes with high impedance were excluded from further analysis ( > 100 kΩ). During the measurement, each participant was asked to sit still, keep their eyes open, and focus on a cross displayed on a screen to reduce physiological artifacts.For participants with normal hearing, the auditory stimuli were delivered through an A-10 amplification system (Pioneer Corporation, Tokyo, Japan) along with inserted earphones (E-A-RTONE Gold 3 A, 3 M, St. Paul, Minneapolis).The software Presentation (Neurobehavioral Systems, Berkeley, USA) was used to present the stimuli and was synchronized with the EEG recording computer by sending TTL triggers.For CI users, music stimuli were presented via a TV audio streamer (Cochlear Ltd, Sydney, Australia). Stimuli were dichotically presented for both groups, i.e. one instrument on each side, and they were swapped in the second half of the experiment. Participants were asked to attend to each instrument on each side in each block of 4 excerpts (in total 8 minutes per block), resulting in a total recording of 32 minutes with attention to each of the two instruments on both sides per participant.The presentation level of the music was set to a loudness level of 6 ("comfortably loud") on a 10-point scale where '0' is inaudible and '10' is a painfully loud. For further information, see Althoff & Nogueira (2026). Althoff, J., & Nogueira, W. (2026). Selective auditory attention decoding in bilateral cochlear implant users to music instruments. Journal of Neural Engineering. http://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/1741-2552/ae3a1a

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average