Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ ZENODOarrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ZENODO
Dataset . 2025
License: CC BY
Data sources: ZENODO
ZENODO
Dataset . 2025
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
addClaim

Examining Changes in Good First Issue Practice and Newcomer Pull Requests since the Release of ChatGPT

Examining Changes in Good First Issue Practice and Newcomer Pull Requests since the Release of ChatGPT

Abstract

Open-source software (OSS) projects rely on effec- tive newcomer onboarding to sustain their communities. Many projects use “good first issue” (GFI) labels to highlight beginner- friendly tasks. The widespread adoption of AI-assisted devel- opment tools shows a significant change within this ecosystem, potentially altering how newcomers contribute and how projects manage simple tasks. This shift necessitates a timely investigation into recent trends in GFI label usage, newcomer engagement, and the success of GFI contributions. This study analyzes 43,906 newcomer pull requests and 1,117 PRs addressing GFIs across 37 popular GitHub repositories from July 2021 to June 2025, examining trends before and after November 2022 when ChatGPT was released. We find that the median proportion of issues with GFI labels declined from 0.90% to 0.74%, yet the proportion of GFIs addressed by newcomers increased from 27.5% to 32.2%. Furthermore, GFI usage varies substantially across projects: 51.7% showed declining trends, 24.1% remained stable, and 24.1% showed increasing trends. This heterogeneity was not explained by repository age or primary programming language. Additionally, merge rates for newcomer contributions to GFIs declined by 24%, while PR description length increased by 47% from 319 to 470 characters. An analysis of factors associated with merge success reveals that review count strongly correlates with merge success, while description length and code size metrics show no significant association. Our findings suggest that GFI trends are driven by project-specific strategic decisions, and successful GFI contributions depend more on maintainer engagement than initial PR characteristics. These results under- score the importance of human-centric onboarding strategies in increasingly AI-augmented OSS ecosystems, providing actionable insights for maintainers and newcomers.

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average