Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ ZENODOarrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ZENODO
Conference object . null
Data sources: ZENODO
addClaim

This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.

You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.

How the misuse of GenAI can spoil the publishing system

Authors: Fraisier-Vannier, Ophélie;

How the misuse of GenAI can spoil the publishing system

Abstract

The recent explosion of generative AI has had a profound impact on society as a whole, particularly through the new possibilities enabled by text generation tools, with ChatGPT being the most well-known example. The research community has not been immune to this phenomenon. In this presentation, I will discuss how this technology has been used by researchers, with a particular focus on its role in questionable research practices related to scientific publishing, and the broader questions this raises about the research ecosystem as a whole.

Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback