
Abstract This study investigated the impact of formative assessment via Google Forms on undergraduate students’ learning outcomes in Educational Technology and Media Literacy. A quasi-experimental design was employed to compare the performance of students assessed digitally through Google Forms with those evaluated using traditional paper-based methods. Data were collected from 192 students using pre-test and post-test measures, and results were analyzed through descriptive statistics and z-test analysis. Findings revealed that students accessed via Google Forms achieved higher post-test mean scores with lower variability compared to their counterparts in traditional assessments, indicating both superior performance and greater consistency. Gender comparisons showed nuanced patterns: female students slightly outperformed males in purely digital environments. These outcomes underscore the dual benefits of Google Form assessments in enhancing academic achievement and supporting gender inclusivity. The study contributes to the growing body of evidence on technology-mediated assessment, with implications for theory, policy, and practice in higher education
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
