
This brief essay challenges the 20th-century philosophical perspective that portrays silence as a refuge in a world threatened by nuclear catastrophe and cultural upheaval. Heidegger situates silence within a metaphysical framework, viewing it as an essential gateway to Being—an act of listening that transcends language. However, this view risks romanticizing the unspoken depths while neglecting the urgent, unarticulated truths of the world. Heidegger’s elevation of silence as a sacred portal to Being, as a retreat that preserves the divine and inexpressible amidst modern crises, detaches silence from the pressing political and ethical realities of our time. To counter this poeticization of world-making, we argue that Klee’s concept of Gestaltung (formation)—a continuous, transformative process—stands in stark contrast to Heidegger’s notion of a static, contemplative silence. It emphasizes dynamic growth, rooted in the inexhaustible entanglement of the visible and the invisible, of form and formlessness.
Paul Klee
Paul Klee
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
