Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ ZENODOarrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

Comparing The Impact of Generative AI Chatbots on Students' Reflective Thinking in Learning Programming

Authors: Rachmat, A.; Watterson, C.; Lundqvist, K.;

Comparing The Impact of Generative AI Chatbots on Students' Reflective Thinking in Learning Programming

Abstract

This full paper explores how a specifically tuned chatbot can support students' reflective thinking. Research in reflective thinking is relatively uncommon in computer science education. In addition, implementing reflective thinking in teaching can be challenging for academics due to the need for student personalized support. Students also often view reflection as an additional assignment rather than a way to improve their learning. Despite these challenges, programming courses can benefit from supporting student learning through specific reflective activities to foster students' reflective thinking. Supporting students' reflective thinking in programming can be achieved by triggering the process through reflective dialogue. A generative AI-based chatbot can facilitate individual and contextual conversations. This study investigates the potential of tuning large language models to trigger reflective dialogue as a learning tool. This study examined the interaction between eleven participants and the use of generative AI learning tools in a controlled laboratory setting, with one-on-one interactions between the researcher, participant, and chatbots. An experimental research design was conducted, including a control group (ChatGPT) and an experiment group (our proposed chatbot). A mixed-methods approach was employed, combining both quantitative data from pre-test and posttest questionnaires using Kember's Reflective Thinking Scale with qualitative data from observations and interviews to assess participants' reflective thinking. The results did not show any statistically significant differences in scores on the Kember's Reflective Thinking Scale. However, thematic analysis of the qualitative data revealed that participants in the experimental group demonstrated more reflective thinking behaviours.

Related Organizations
Keywords

Generative AI, Reflective Thinking, Programming Courses, Chatbot

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Green