
Mental well-being is fundamental to both the academic performance and overall success of engineering students. Given the demanding curricula and high expectations inherent in engineering programs, many students experience significant chronic stress that can hinder their ability to engage fully with their studies and reach their potential. To better understand these challenges, we developed a comprehensive survey instrument and distributed it among engineering students, aiming to delve deeply into their experiences and identify areas where enhanced support could enrich student life within the department. Our survey findings revealed a spectrum of experiences. A majority of participants reported positive interactions with campus resources and conveyed that they felt valued at East Tennessee State University. However, some students also expressed a need for additional support, particularly in areas such as career preparation and mental health services. Furthermore, respondents highlighted external challenges—ranging from financial constraints to the impact of global events—that further affect their mental well-being. These insights underscore the importance of a community-centered approach, one that not only leverages existing resources but also continuously seeks innovative strategies to address emerging challenges. By reinforcing support systems and fostering engagement and dialogue, we can create an environment where every engineering student has the opportunity to thrive both academically and personally.
Engineering Student Success, Mental Health, Well-being
Engineering Student Success, Mental Health, Well-being
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
