
The main objective of this article is to examine how non-invigilated and invigilatedtesting conditions affect the results of a basic mathematics skills test of first-yearengineering students in the Finnish education system. We also examine which subjectareas of invigilated testing particularly affect the results. The data used in the studyconsists of tests organised at two Finnish universities in 2023 and 2024.The mean test result is significantly higher in the non-invigilated test than in theinvigilated test, both done electronically. The difference in points between the testswas statistically significant in all other questions except for the tasks related todifferentiation, and the conceptual understanding of inverse and reciprocal. The mostsignificant decrease in invigilated test points was in the most difficult but easilycheatable tasks related to solving equations, especially trigonometric and exponentialequations, and in a task that required calculating a definite integral.
Peer reviewed
Cheating, Invigilation, Mathematics Basic Skills, Proctoring, 113
Cheating, Invigilation, Mathematics Basic Skills, Proctoring, 113
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
