Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ ZENODOarrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ZENODO
Preprint . 2025
License: CC BY NC ND
Data sources: ZENODO
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ZENODO
Other literature type . 2025
License: CC BY
Data sources: ZENODO
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ZENODO
Other literature type . 2025
License: CC BY
Data sources: ZENODO
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ZENODO
Preprint . 2025
License: CC BY NC ND
Data sources: ZENODO
ZENODO
Preprint . 2025
License: CC BY NC ND
Data sources: Datacite
ZENODO
Preprint . 2025
License: CC BY NC ND
Data sources: Datacite
ZENODO
Presentation . 2025
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
ZENODO
Presentation . 2025
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
ZENODO
Presentation . 2025
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
ZENODO
Preprint . 2025
License: CC BY NC ND
Data sources: Datacite
versions View all 7 versions
addClaim

Elementos de evaluación de políticas editoriales alineadas con la ciencia abierta: preprints, datos de investigación y evaluación abierta

Authors: Silveira, Lúcia da; Caregnato, Sônia Elisa; Melero, Remedios; Abadal, Ernest;

Elementos de evaluación de políticas editoriales alineadas con la ciencia abierta: preprints, datos de investigación y evaluación abierta

Abstract

[319] La ciencia abierta se ha consolidado como un movimiento clave para transformar la comunicación científica mediante transparencia, colaboración y accesibilidad. Entre sus dimensiones centrales destacan la evaluación por pares abierta (OPR), los preprints y los datos de investigación, que fortalecen la credibilidad de las revistas, pero exigen políticas editoriales claras, éticas y sostenibles. Este estudio tuvo como objetivo identificar y sistematizar elementos de evaluación que orienten la formulación de políticas editoriales alineadas con la ciencia abierta y la creación de sistemas de monitoreo de su implementación. Se realizó una scoping review siguiendo las directrices del JBI, con búsquedas en ocho bases de datos y un portafolio final de 109 artículos. A partir de la literatura, se formularon 43 elementos de evaluación distribuidos en tres dimensiones: OPR, preprints y datos de investigación. Estos elementos ofrecen un marco analítico para comparar políticas editoriales y monitorear la adopción de prácticas de ciencia abierta en distintos contextos disciplinares e institucionales. Open science has established itself as a key movement for transforming scientific communication through transparency, collaboration, and accessibility. Among its central dimensions are open peer review (OPR), preprints, and research data, which strengthen the credibility of journals but require clear, ethical, and sustainable editorial policies. This study aimed to identify and systematize evaluation elements to guide the formulation of editorial policies aligned with open science and the creation of systems to monitor their implementation. A scoping review was conducted following JBI guidelines, with searches in eight databases and a final portfolio of 109 articles. Based on the literature, 43 evaluation elements were formulated, distributed across three dimensions: OPR, preprints, and research data. These elements provide an analytical framework for comparing editorial policies and monitoring the adoption of open science practices in different disciplinary and institutional contexts.

Keywords

Datos de investigacion, Monitoreo de revistas, Evaluación abierta, monitoreo de revistas, Preprints as Topic, datos de investigación, preprints, Políticas editoriales, políticas editoriales

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Green