Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ ZENODOarrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ZENODO
Journal . 2025
License: CC BY
Data sources: ZENODO
ZENODO
Journal . 2025
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
ZENODO
Journal . 2025
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

Diagnostic, Management Capacity and Outcomes for Neonates with Sepsis in Rural Health Facilities of Northern Ghana: A Mixed Methods Assessment

Authors: IJMSRT;

Diagnostic, Management Capacity and Outcomes for Neonates with Sepsis in Rural Health Facilities of Northern Ghana: A Mixed Methods Assessment

Abstract

Globally, neonates with sepsis contribute to nearly a third of the 2.3 million neontal deaths annually due to gaps associated with poor diagnosis, insufficient referral networks and caregiver delays. These gaps disproportionately affect children of rural dwellers in Ghana. This research investigated diagnostic capacity and clinical outcomes of neonates with sepsis admitted to health facilities in Gushegu and Nkwanta South districts. Both the Health Systems Framework and the Three Delays Model were used to establish and analyze all gaps and present findings. A convergent mixedmethods design was employed in target facilities 322 neonatal records were reviewed, and interviews conducted with caregivers and health workers. Data were collected between March and June 2021 after ethical approval were obtained from Ghana Health Service’s Institutional Review Board (GHS-ERC 008/03/20). Among the 322 subjects, 58% were women with 70% were receiving below GHS 500 as montly income. In Gushegu, formal education among caregivers was low (43%) with the average trips to the facilities above 2 hours. In all facilities studied, none provided for C-reactive protein (CRP) or blood culture test. In both districts, recovery rates were relatively low, Gushegu (52%) and Nkwanta South (64%), while the rates of death were lower at 20% and 14%, respectively. Late presentation (>48 hours) tripled poor outcomes (OR = 2.8), delayed intravenous antibiotics (>6 hours) increased death at almost four times (OR = 3.9) and delayed referral (12 hours or longer) doubled mortality risk considerably (OR = 2.1). Only 31% of health workers had recieved recent training. Diagnostic bottlenecks, delayed referral, and systemic weaknesses in neonatal-care institutions led to significant morbidity and mortality. Besides, the presence of sociodemographic underprivileged and bad knowledge of caregivers all contribute to the time delay towards seeking help by the patient. It is essential to bridge these gaps to promote decreased neonatal mortality in rural Ghana. Recommendations come from strengthening medical diagnostic infrastructure as well as the development of new clinical guidelines and referral systems, integrating neonatal sepsis indicators to the District Health Information Management System, version 2 (DHIMS2), and enhancing caregiver training and financial support systems.

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Green