Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ ZENODOarrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ZENODO
Article . 2025
License: CC BY
Data sources: ZENODO
ZENODO
Article . 2025
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
ZENODO
Article . 2025
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

Effect of Contaminants on Reverse Torque Values of Implant Abutment Screws: A Systematic Review and Partial Meta-Analysis of In Vitro Studies

Authors: Mohan, Gayathri;

Effect of Contaminants on Reverse Torque Values of Implant Abutment Screws: A Systematic Review and Partial Meta-Analysis of In Vitro Studies

Abstract

 Introduction: Screw loosening is a common complication in implant systems, often influenced by contamination during abutment placement. Reverse torque values (RTVs) are used to assess implant-abutment joint integrity. Objectives To evaluate the effect of various contaminants on RTVs of implant abutment screws using data from in vitro studies. Methods This systematic review and meta-analysis was registered in PROSPERO (CRD420251064053) and conducted according to PRISMA guidelines. Literature searches of PubMed, Scopus, and Cochrane (2000-2024) identified studies assessing saliva, blood, chlorhexidine, fluoride, tetracycline, and artificial saliva. Risk of bias was assessed using ROB 2. Statistical analyses included two-way ANOVA and Tukey's HSD. Results: Twelve studies were included. Saliva consistently produced the highest RTVs, while blood showed the lowest. ANOVA revealed significant differences between groups (F(2,93) = 292.64, p < 0.00001). Tukey's test confirmed significant pairwise differences: Contaminant vs. Torque (Q = 32.01, p < 0.00001), Contaminant vs. Reverse Torque (Q = 26.46, p < 0.00001), and Torque vs. Reverse Torque (Q = 5.56, p = 0.00048). Saliva provided the most favorable torque retention, followed by chlorhexidine and fluoride. Conclusions: Contaminants significantly affect implant-abutment stability. Saliva may improve torque retention, whereas blood is most detrimental. Standardized protocols and in vivo validation are needed

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Green