
DISCLAIMER AND STATEMENT OF ANALYTICAL SCOPE This paper, titled "Evolutionary Predicament of Human Societal Governance and the Feasibility of Non-Anthropomorphic Computational Systems as a Sustainable Trajectory," presents a formal analysis grounded in system dynamics, evolutionary game theory, and computational complexity. 1. Objective and Value-Neutrality: The conclusions presented regarding the long-term convergence of the Global Civilization System (GCS) and Global Social System (GSS) toward "Self-Destruction" or "Eternal Totalitarianism" are derived purely from an analysis of the structural, mathematical, and evolutionary constraints inherent in high-complexity, multi-agent systems with exponential technological growth and sub-exponential coordination capacity. This study is conducted with strict value-neutrality. It is an engineering assessment of systemic fragility, not a moral judgment, political manifesto, or ideological argument. 2. Scope of Analysis (Prediction vs. Prescription): The identification of the two terminal states—the Self-Destruction probability attractor and the Global Stability Trap (Eternal Totalitarianism) attractor—is intended for the sole purpose of theoretical modeling, academic discourse, and risk mitigation in long-term governance strategy. This paper does not endorse, advocate for, or call for the establishment of any specific political system. Its findings should not be interpreted as a justification for any particular political action or ideology. 3. Warning Against Misinterpretation: The authors explicitly warn against the misinterpretation or weaponization of these findings for political discourse or policy advocacy. The analysis focuses on systemic inevitability under current, non-remediated parameters, which is meant to inform the urgent search for a paradigm shift in global governance, not to despair over present conditions or to provide a philosophical basis for fatalism. The responsibility for addressing and avoiding these predicted systemic failures remains with global political actors and civil society.
AI Governance, Systemic Risk, Anti-Hijacking System, Computational Politics, Existential Risk, Evolutionary Psychology, Non-Anthropocentric Governance, Speculative Model, Civilizational Collapse, Evolutionary Mismatch, Totalitarianism Dynamics, Long-Term Survival
AI Governance, Systemic Risk, Anti-Hijacking System, Computational Politics, Existential Risk, Evolutionary Psychology, Non-Anthropocentric Governance, Speculative Model, Civilizational Collapse, Evolutionary Mismatch, Totalitarianism Dynamics, Long-Term Survival
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
