
Low-dose computed tomography (LDCT) is widely used for lung cancer screening because it significantly reduces radiation exposure. However, lowering the radiation dose increases image noise and reconstruction artifacts, which often mask small nodules or distort tumor boundaries. Deep learning techniques have emerged as powerful tools for restoring LDCT quality without sacrificing diagnostic content. This study investigates the effectiveness of convolutional neural networks (CNNs) and generative adversarial networks (GANs) for artifact reduction and noise suppression in LDCT lung images. Using a curated dataset from public repositories, LDCT images were enhanced and compared against routine-dose CT (RDCT) references. Performance was evaluated using peak signal-to-noise ratio (PSNR), structural similarity index (SSIM), and tumor visibility scores assessed by radiologists. Results show that GAN-based models achieved the highest artifact reduction performance, improving PSNR by 28.4% and SSIM by 17.6% compared to conventional denoising methods. The improved clarity of tumor edges and lesion contrast confirmed the superiority of deep learning approaches. The findings suggest that deep learning-based reconstruction can significantly enhance tumor visibility in LDCT scans, supporting more accurate early detection and diagnosis.
Low-dose CT; Deep learning; Artifact reduction; Lung tumor visibility; CNN; GAN; Image enhancement; Medical imaging; Noise reduction; Radiation safety.
Low-dose CT; Deep learning; Artifact reduction; Lung tumor visibility; CNN; GAN; Image enhancement; Medical imaging; Noise reduction; Radiation safety.
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
