Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ ZENODOarrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ZENODO
Other literature type . 2025
License: CC BY
Data sources: ZENODO
ZENODO
Presentation . 2025
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
ZENODO
Presentation . 2025
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

The Future of Scientific Publishing

Authors: Haustein, Stefanie;

The Future of Scientific Publishing

Abstract

Presentation at the Royal Society of Canada Celebration of Excellence & Engagement 2025 panel "The Future of Scientific organized by Érudit Panel discussion with Chad Gaffield, Arash Abizadeh and Stefanie Haustein, 15 November 2025, Montréal Researchers find themselves trapped in a publishing system under strain: libraries can no longer afford rising subscription costs, journals have gone digital but retained outdated print-era conventions, and the pressure to publish in prestigious venues continues to shape careers and research priorities. Today, the system faces a deeper crisis of credibility: paper mills and AI tools fabricate fake articles, while editors struggle to find reviewers as submissions soar. As commercial publishers profit from open access policies through fees that are based on prestige not production costs, pressure on editors to publish more, faster, and on marketable topics continues to grow. However, the call for reform has never been louder, with the National Institutes of Health (NIH) in the U.S. considering caps on article processing charges (APCs) and the Royal Society in the U.K. adopting a collectively funded diamond open access model. With an updated Tri-Agency open access policy about to be released, the panel will discuss what role Canada, and foremost Royal Society members, can play in reclaiming scholarly publishing as a trustworthy, sustainable, and community-driven public good.

Related Organizations
  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Green