Abstract: This article deals with the sematic and structural characteristicsof political discourse. It aims at showing how language can manipulatepolitical situations. It starts by asserting the importance of language as a toolfor conveying meaning through interaction among people. Then we tried toestablish the importance of discourse analysis to determine the social,ideological and institutional statue. Through the analysis of politicaldiscourse found in interviews, speeches conducted directly or indirectly, wewere able to conduct Political discourse analysis involving the informalexchange of well-reasoned opinions to determine the best course of actionfor addressing societal issues. Using Speech Act theory and Discourse analysis,we analyzed real-life contexts and found that speech acts rarely occur inisolation; they unfold in sequences within structured activities like debates,conversations, and parliamentary proceedings. We have found thatPoliticians worldwide enhance their language in distinct ways to amplify theirmessage and achieve the goal of securing more votes. Moreover, the mostprominent characteristic of discourse taken from the media is that it is meantto address absent public audience, not groups of people present in the studio.Politicians and political workers can imitate the political transparencythrough rhetorical and media Maneuvers. Political interviews are highlyorganized speech, governed by specific discourse rules and that interviewer.These norms involve both the politician and the interviewer