Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ ZENODOarrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ZENODO
Article . 2025
License: CC BY
Data sources: ZENODO
International Journal of Science and Research Archive
Article . 2025 . Peer-reviewed
Data sources: Crossref
ZENODO
Article . 2025
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
ZENODO
Article . 2025
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
versions View all 3 versions
addClaim

Infrastructure Sharing in Telecommunications: Economic Impact, Implementation Strategies and Empirical Analysis

Authors: Abdalla, Musaab Abdelmageed Abdelraheem;

Infrastructure Sharing in Telecommunications: Economic Impact, Implementation Strategies and Empirical Analysis

Abstract

Infrastructure sharing has emerged as a critical strategy for telecommunications operators to manage deployment costs, accelerate network rollout, and optimize resource utilization in increasingly competitive markets. This study provides a comprehensive analysis of telecommunications infrastructure sharing strategies, examining both passive and active sharing models through empirical investigation and economic modeling. Using data from the Sudanese telecommunications market and comparative analysis with international studies, we quantify the economic benefits of different sharing arrangements and identify key implementation challenges. Our analysis reveals significant cost reduction potential, with CAPEX savings ranging from 20-65% for different infrastructure components and OPEX reductions of 25-60% across operational categories. The study distinguishes between passive infrastructure sharing (towers, sites, power systems) and active sharing (base stations, network equipment), demonstrating that passive sharing offers substantial benefits with lower implementation complexity. Through detailed case studies of successful cooperation arrangements, including fiber optic network sharing that generated savings exceeding $14 million, we illustrate the practical benefits and challenges of infrastructure sharing implementation. The research identifies cost reduction, regulatory policies, and risk sharing as primary drivers of infrastructure sharing, while competitive concerns, trust deficits, and technical complexity represent significant barriers. Our findings contribute to understanding how infrastructure sharing can support telecommunications development, particularly in developing markets where capital constraints and coverage challenges are most acute. The study provides actionable recommendations for operators, regulators, and policymakers seeking to optimize infrastructure sharing policies while maintaining competitive market dynamics.

Related Organizations
Keywords

Passive Sharing, CAPEX Reduction, Fiber Optic Networks, Active Sharing, Tower Sharing, Developing Markets, Telecommunications Infrastructure, Cost Optimization, Network Deployment

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Green