Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ ZENODOarrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ZENODO
Other literature type . 2025
License: CC BY
Data sources: ZENODO
ZENODO
Data Paper . 2025
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
ZENODO
Data Paper . 2025
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

Stage 1. Apply goal question metric approach to target questions.

Authors: Amador Donado, Siler; PARDO CALVACHE, CESAR JESUS; Mazo, Raul;

Stage 1. Apply goal question metric approach to target questions.

Abstract

Stage 1 of the Systematic Literature Review (SLR) protocol focused on applying the Goal Question Metric (GQM)approach proposed by Basili and Caldiera, with the aim of structuring the research process from an analytical and measurable perspective. At the conceptual level, four Search Goals (SG1–SG4) —What, How, Which, and Why— were defined to establish the motivation, scope, and justification of the study, as well as to identify trends, gaps, and existing cybersecurity models. At the operational level, these goals served as the foundation for formulating the Research Questions (RQs), which were evaluated using twelve quality criteria (clarity, relevance, consistency, feasibility, among others) to ensure methodological precision and coherence. Finally, at the quantitative level, metrics were defined for each question to enable objective measurement of responses, and seven data sources, including academic databases and gray literature (Scopus, Web of Science, IEEE Xplore, ScienceDirect, SpringerLink, ACM Digital Library, and Google Scholar), were selected following the methodological guidelines of Kitchenham and Charters (2007) and the PRISMA 2020 reporting standards. This ensured traceability, comprehensiveness, and methodological rigor throughout the development of the review.

Related Organizations
  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Green