
Assessing and communicating the impact of research development is increasingly important for research development professionals and research leadership within institutions of higher education. This article sets forth a framework for categorizing research development metrics, explores realistic ways of assessing the impact of research development, makes recommendations for the research development professionals charged with assessing the impact of the research development function, and discusses challenges and mitigation strategies. It is a first step in documenting the research development field’s current practices in assessing the impact of research development. Although this adaptable framework can apply to research development in almost any type of institution, we make special notes for considerations among emerging research institutions (ERIs) and minority serving institutions (MSIs).
metrics, research development
metrics, research development
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
