Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ ZENODOarrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ZENODO
Dataset . 2025
License: CC BY
Data sources: ZENODO
ZENODO
Dataset . 2025
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
ZENODO
Dataset . 2025
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

Fruit Quality – Good vs Bad for Apple, Banana, Lime

Authors: Rajan, Saravanan;

Fruit Quality – Good vs Bad for Apple, Banana, Lime

Abstract

This dataset contains colour images of top fruit types with two quality labels: Good and Bad. It includes six classes: Apple_Good, Apple_Bad, Banana_Good, Banana_Bad, Lime_Good, Lime_Bad. The approximate sample counts per class are: Apple_Bad: 1141 Apple_Good: 1134 Banana_Bad: 1087 Banana_Good: 1113 Lime_Bad: 1085 Lime_Good: 1094 The images were captured under varying lighting conditions, backgrounds and viewpoints, using high-resolution mobile phone cameras, both indoor and outdoor. The dataset is derived from the FruitNet dataset (Meshram et al., 2022) which originally included six fruits (apple, banana, guava, lime, orange, pomegranate) and three quality labels (Good/Bad/Mixed) with ~19 500 images. In this version we have selected the six classes (three fruits × two quality levels) to provide a balanced corpus of ~ 6,700 images. Each image is stored at 256×256 resolution (or rescaled to this size) and labelled with the class name. Intended Use:This dataset is suitable for research in computer vision, particularly fruit quality classification, defect detection, visual sorting in agriculture, and related machine learning tasks. Source / Reference:Meshram V. A., Patil K., Ramteke S. D. “MNet: A Framework to Reduce Fruit Image Misclassification” (2021) IIETA. DOI: 10.18280/isi.260203. Dataset details: top Indian fruits, Good/Bad labels, ~12,000 images. (IIETA) Dataset structuring: Directory per class (e.g. Apple_Bad/) JPEG or PNG images Recommended preprocessing: resizing to 256×256, normalising pixel values, optional data augmentation

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average