
This article examines politeness strategies in English and Uzbek from both pragmatic and typological perspectives. It explores how cultural values, social hierarchies, and communicative conventions influence linguistic expressions of politeness in each language. The study reveals that while English emphasizes individual autonomy, indirectness, and minimal hierarchical marking, Uzbek prioritizes collectivism, respect, and elaborate honorific systems. Drawing on modern pragmatics, the paper discusses the universal principles of face and social harmony alongside culture-specific realizations. Attention is also given to pragmatic transfer in language learning and the adaptation of politeness norms in digital communication. The findings show that although politeness is a universal aspect of human interaction, its linguistic manifestations differ according to social structure and worldview. Understanding these distinctions is essential for effective intercultural communication, language teaching, and translation.
politeness, pragmatics, English, Uzbek, collectivism, individualism, indirectness, hierarchy, intercultural communication, typology.
politeness, pragmatics, English, Uzbek, collectivism, individualism, indirectness, hierarchy, intercultural communication, typology.
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
