
The global biodiversity crisis needs urgent conservation action, yet these efforts often intersect complexly with the livelihoods of rural communities dependent on natural resources. This complete study examines the multifaceted relationship between wildlife conservation initiatives and rural economic systems, with particular focus on the Maldhok Abhayaranya (Great Indian Bustard Sanctuary) in Solapur, Maharashtra. Employing a detailed qualitative methodology, the research incorporates data from 30 household interviews, six focus group discussions on gender and age demographics, key informant interviews with local officials, and extensive participant observation. The findings tell a paradoxical dynamic: while conservation measures impose significant restrictions on traditional livelihood activities like grazing and fuel wood collection, they simultaneously create economic opportunities through eco-tourism, restoration employment, and artisanal enterprises. A critical pressure emerges from widespread dissatisfaction with current compensation mechanisms for wildlife-related losses, contrasted against cautious optimism about potential benefits from more inclusive development approaches. The study gives a robust policy framework advocating for integrated conservation-livelihood strategies that emphasize participatory governance, equitable benefit distribution, and diversified income generation. By systematically positioning ecological preservation objectives with rural socio-economic aspirations, this model offers a practicable pathway toward achieving both biodiversity protection and community resilience, suggesting that the long-term survival of endangered species like the Great Indian Bustard may depend as much on addressing human development requirements as on ecological measures.
Wildlife Conservation, Rural Livelihoods, Great Indian Bustard, Human–Wildlife Conflict, Ecotourism, Sustainable Development
Wildlife Conservation, Rural Livelihoods, Great Indian Bustard, Human–Wildlife Conflict, Ecotourism, Sustainable Development
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
