Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ ZENODOarrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ZENODO
Other literature type . 2025
License: CC BY NC SA
Data sources: ZENODO
ZENODO
Presentation . 2025
License: CC BY NC SA
Data sources: Datacite
ZENODO
Presentation . 2025
License: CC BY NC SA
Data sources: Datacite
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

[Webinar] The Trust Shield: Building Democratic Resilience in the Digital Age

Authors: Edmond, Jennifer; Morriseau, Tiffany; Sutherland, Jessica; Singh, Sahib; Lima, Eleonora; Ruíz de Assin de los Santos, María;

[Webinar] The Trust Shield: Building Democratic Resilience in the Digital Age

Abstract

KT4D organised this webinar on 13 Novemebr 2025, the day after the publication of the European Democracy Shield by the European Commission. Trust is the foundation of democratic life. It is what allows citizens to delegate authority, share knowledge, and participate confidently in public life. Yet in today’s digital age, the foundations of that trust are being tested. The rapid integration of artificial intelligence and big data into everyday decision-making, information systems, and governance is transforming how people form, lose, and rebuild trust. The capacity to engage confidently with these systems, from evaluating information, exercising autonomy to maintaining fairness, has become essential for citizens and policymakers alike. Understanding how trust operates in this new context is crucial to ensuring that technological progress strengthens, rather than weakens, civic participation. At the individual level, trust depends on people’s capacity to make informed decisions about whether and when to believe information that is perceived as being produced, mediated, or amplified by algorithmic systems. At the institutional level, it rests on transparency, accountability, and inclusive governance mechanisms that ensure AI systems serve the public good. And at the cultural level, trust is shaped by shared values, language diversity, and historical experiences that influence how communities perceive and adopt new technologies. Finally, education and critical digital literacy cut across all these layers. They transform vulnerability into empowerment by equipping individuals and communities with the knowledge and skills to understand, question, and co-create the technologies shaping their lives. Together, these dimensions can form an ecosystem of trust — one that supports democratic resilience, aligns with the goals of the European Democracy Shield, and ensures that Europe’s digital transformation remains ethical, participatory, and culturally inclusive. The webinar is relevant to anyone involved in shaping or responding to digital policy in democratic societies. It will be of particular interest to local government officials, EU and national policymakers, civil society actors, researchers in the social sciences and humanities, software developers, and technologists interested in civic tech or human-centred design.

Related Organizations
Keywords

Trust, Democracy

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Funded by
Related to Research communities