Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
ZENODOarrow_drop_down
ZENODO
Preprint . 2025
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
ZENODO
Preprint . 2025
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
ZENODO
Preprint . 2025
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
versions View all 3 versions
addClaim

Γ-convergence of a diffeomorphism-natural MDL functional to Einstein–Hilbert with Gibbons–Hawking–York boundary term

Authors: Lela, Marko;

Γ-convergence of a diffeomorphism-natural MDL functional to Einstein–Hilbert with Gibbons–Hawking–York boundary term

Abstract

**Abstract.** This work proves a Γ-convergence result for a diffeomorphism-natural discrete “MDL” (minimal description length–type) functional to the full Einstein–Hilbert action with the Gibbons–Hawking–York (GHY) boundary term. On boundary-fitted, shape-regular meshes we establish interior and boundary blow-up analyses (TP1–TP5), identify the Carathéodory densities \(f_{\mathrm{in}}=\alpha_0+\alpha_1 R\) and \(f_{\mathrm{bdry}}=\beta_1 K\), and prove the \(\liminf/\limsup\) inequalities via a recovery sequence based on reflected Fermi smoothing. As a result, the discrete energies Γ-converge to \[c_0\!\int_M dV_g + c_1\!\int_M R_g\,dV_g + c_2\!\int_{\partial M} K_g\,dS_g,\]and stability of minimizers holds under equi-coercivity. **Version 1.1 notes (2025-11-13).** - Added a concise **Conclusion** with MIS (Meta Information Symmetry) context and outlook. - **Unified boundary sign convention**: outer unit normal; \(K=\mathrm{tr}_h II>0\) on spheres. Visible reminder near the main theorem; consistent references in TP2/TP4/TP5/TP6/TP8 and “Scope”. - **Citations expanded** across TP3–TP6 and the appendices (e.g., Federer, Lovelock, Kolář–Michor–Slovák, Ciarlet/Brenner–Scott, Regge; Hartle–Sorkin). Text-only additions; **no changes to statements or proofs**. - **Typesetting fixes**: cleaned abstract/math display of \(F(g)\); resolved minor math-mode issues. - **Appendices**: Smoothing (App. A) extended with \(L^1\) stability for \(R\) and \(K\) and a complete **Lemma U**; Rate protocol (App. E) added; Scan indifference/BA3 (App. F) added. **Boundary-first analysis.** A first-layer asymptotics shows that boundary cells contribute at order \(h^{d-1}\) (not \(o(h^{d-1})\)), yielding the GHY term in the limit and a global \(O(h)\) boundary remainder, while the interior remainder scales as \(O(h^2)\). **Foundational scope and reproducibility.** No numerical results are claimed. Appendix E provides a reproducible “sanity-check protocol” (test geometries, expected rates, calibration of \(\alpha_0,\alpha_1,\beta_1\), and suggested diagnostic plots) to independently confirm the predicted \(O(h)\)/\(O(h^2)\) global rates. **Files in this record.** - PDF of the paper (v1.1). - LaTeX source bundle (v1.1) with .tex/.bib, figures, and build scripts, for full reproducibility. **Keywords:** Γ-convergence; Einstein–Hilbert action; Gibbons–Hawking–York boundary term; Regge calculus (discrete gravity); diffeomorphism-natural energies; Carathéodory densities; reflected Fermi coordinates; boundary-fitted meshes; variational limits; stability of minimizers. **Primary subjects:** Mathematical Physics; Differential Geometry; Analysis of PDEs; General Relativity and Quantum Cosmology. **Notes for readers:** - This is a theory paper; numerical sanity checks are deliberately deferred. - The appendix includes all assumptions (“constants bracket”), window/mesh setups, and calibration steps to enable independent replication of the predicted rates. If you cite this deposit, please use the Zenodo DOI and the title: “Γ-convergence of a diffeomorphism-natural MDL functional to Einstein–Hilbert with Gibbons–Hawking–York boundary term.”

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!