Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ ZENODOarrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ZENODO
Preprint . 2025
License: CC BY
Data sources: ZENODO
ZENODO
Preprint . 2025
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
ZENODO
Preprint . 2025
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

Unified Theory of the Background (UT) — Working Draft v2 (Theoretical Map)

Authors: Vladimir V. Yakovlev;

Unified Theory of the Background (UT) — Working Draft v2 (Theoretical Map)

Abstract

Summary. The Unified Theory of the Background (UT) treats space as a real compressible medium (“O-medium”). Matter corresponds to stable structural defects of this medium; fields are its waves and vortices; gravity emerges as a pressure-gradient effect with Yukawa-type screening that preserves the Newtonian near field while suppressing far-field tails. Linearization reproduces a Maxwell-like sector with wave speed c₀; a coherent (“quantum-limit”) regime introduces a universal action scale χ and an acoustic-metric picture for small disturbances. Two radiation branches are identified: a longitudinal (quadrupole-leading) and a transverse (vortex/Larmor-like) branch. The document is a compact theoretical map and calibration framework for subsequent lab and astrophysical tests, emphasizing falsifiability via cross-linked measurements where one calibration must explain multiple classes of data. Scope & intent. This is a working draft intended for citation and archival purposes (DOI on Zenodo) and for guiding future submissions (e.g., arXiv/journal). It consolidates postulates, neutral terminology, symbol conventions (RU/EN), module cards (MACRO/EM/Inertia/Nuclear/Quantum/Relativistic/Radiation), and a stepwise calibration roster for parameters (c₀, ρ∞, Lρ, κ, κₛ(ρ), χ). It also includes a “paradox → UT mechanism → what to test” map (entanglement, delayed choice, Bentley paradox, singularities, radiation balance) and bridge cards clarifying how UT embeds standard theories without discarding their verified predictions. Validation roadmap (high-level). Proposed checks include: dual-axis cryo-resonators (fix c₀), ring or two-path interferometers + Talbot–Lau (fix χ), screened-field quasi-statics and NV-center probes (inform κ, Lρ), Casimir-offset experiments (inform κ), and astrophysical fits to EHT shadows and galactic rotation curves (constrain Lρ and core radius). Nuclear-scale curvature stiffness κₛ(ρ) is treated as an optional module gated by clear signatures (e.g., heavy-ion EOS, Hoyle-like levels). One calibration set must co-explain multiple datasets; failure triggers a marked “off/rebuild” status for the affected module. Keywords unified theory of the background; O-medium; compressible medium; structural defect; pressure-gradient gravity; Yukawa screening; acoustic metric; Maxwell-like linearization; longitudinal radiation; vortex (transverse) radiation; calibration roster; falsifiability; screening length Lρ; capillarity κ; curvature stiffness κₛ; action scale χ; cryogenic resonator; ring interferometer; Talbot–Lau; NV centers; Casimir offset; EHT shadows; rotation curves; ringdown/Q-factor

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Green