
The morphological identification of lepidopteran pest pupae has long been a difficult task. To explore automated solutions, this study established a standardized, multi-angle image dataset of pupae from 11 economically important lepidopteran pests. We then systematically evaluated six deep learning models, including both convolutional neural networks and Transformer architectures. The results show that all models successfully learned to distinguish the vast majority of species, with Vit-Small achieving the highest accuracy (0.9871±0.0016%) and the highest F1-score (0.9869±0.0020%). This confirms that pupal morphology provides sufficient discriminative visual information to support highly accurate automated identification. However, all models exhibited consistent, minor confusion among Helicoverpa armigera, Mythimna separata and Spodoptera exigua. Analysis revealed these errors originated from specific viewing angles of a limited number of specimens, underscoring the value of the multi-angle imaging protocol used in this study. This study transforms pupal identification from a traditional taxonomic difficulty into a solvable computer vision task, providing a dataset, methodological benchmarks, and a feasibility validation for developing image-based tools for pupal-stage pest surveillance.
Deep Learning/classification
Deep Learning/classification
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
