
The essence of the paper is a reflection on the necessity to integrate Artificial Intelligence (AI) in marketing with regards to personalization strategies. It is based on the modern literature from the year 2020-2025 and examines the potential of using AI to increase personalization and achieve the following results in marketing: enhanced consumer connection, organizational performance, and focus with stakeholder and sustainability objectives. The studies rely on some of the most significant theoretical constructs which include the Marketing Mix, the Stakeholder Theory, the Triple bottom-line and the Hunt Vitell Theory of Marketing Ethics to examine the ethical and positive impacts of AI personalization gadgets. Real-life case studies of companies, such as Netflix, H&M, Amazon, or Meta, were utilized in the discussion as an opportunity to identify the opportunities of AI, and the significant threats of AI regarding data privacy, biased algorithms, or manipulation of the consumer. The report presents recommendations, which are, and which require the emphasis on fairness, transparency, and ethical innovation. These include the implementation of effective AI, condolence logs on fairness, and advancing commercial analytics experiential attempts. The research indicates that organizations must strike a balance between the current rise in the technological world and irresponsible, humanistic approaches to marketing.
Artificial Intelligence, marketing personalization, stakeholder theory, algorithmic bias, ethical marketing, transparency, triple bottom line, customer engagement, Artificial Intelligence, marketing personalization, stakeholder theory, algorithmic bias, ethical marketing, transparency, triple bottom line, customer engagement
Artificial Intelligence, marketing personalization, stakeholder theory, algorithmic bias, ethical marketing, transparency, triple bottom line, customer engagement, Artificial Intelligence, marketing personalization, stakeholder theory, algorithmic bias, ethical marketing, transparency, triple bottom line, customer engagement
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
